Conflicts over the forest of the future
Drought and aridity, fires and pests: Climate change is threatening Germany’s forests. To make them resilient for the future, the German government is promoting forest conversion from conifers to mixed and deciduous forests. But what exactly should this “forest of the future” look like and who will be allowed to use it? There is a great deal of controversy about this. After all, the forest plays a variety of roles: For recreation, timber production, hunting, as a place for wind power or for climate protection. Trees and plants pull CO2 from the air and store carbon in trunks, roots and the soil. They host a diversity of species in ecosystems that buffer climate change. So how do you reconcile nature conservation and climate protection with the economic use of forests?
Conflicts over forest use
As climate change progresses, this discussion about forests is coming to a head. Not infrequently, this leads to tangible conflicts over very specific forest areas. In order to resolve these disagreements and find sensible solutions for the future, dialogue is becoming increasingly important. Only if forest users with different positions and interests also talk to each other and jointly search for compromises can the solution work.
ISOE investigates the conflicts about the forest of the future and ways for a constructive dialogue from a scientific perspective. In the research project “Conflicts over the forest of the future – analysis and cooperative processing of forest-related negotiation processes in the context of climate change”, round tables are held. People from very different backgrounds are invited to participate and thus move the debate forward. ISOE’s goal is to use case studies to explore what kind of dialogue brings the parties closer together instead of driving them further apart.
Round tables in four regions
In a first step, the “round table” format is used for conflict management in four different regions. Representatives of different interest groups discuss a factual problem on an equal footing, make each other understand the different perspectives and try to find a common solution to a conflict. A round table is therefore a results-oriented group discussion in which the participants represent as many interests as possible in a topic.
This result can be, for example, an idea, a solution proposal or a cooperation approach. The round tables are moderated by an independent mediator and also receive scientific support. In the project, the roundtable format promotes expert and practice-relevant exchange on a controversial topic in the context of forest management in climate change. Different forms of knowledge and expertise are brought together and made accessible for practice. Furthermore, the roundtables enable a comprehensive gain of knowledge for the scientific research interest.
Research approach
In a first step, the ISOE project team investigated the currently most explosive conflict dynamics at the interface of nature conservation, climate protection and forestry. Literature research and document analysis have resulted in an overview of concrete current conflict issues that arise in forest design. From this, individual conflict areas and local case studies are selected and analyzed in detail. Actions, interpretations and viewpoints of the actors involved are described, examined and reconstructed from their respective perspectives.
The second step is to deal with the previously identified conflicts. The actors involved are given the opportunity to engage in an exchange with each other. In addition to round tables, other formats are tested that can contribute to de-escalation. In addition, case studies are used to develop communication approaches appropriate to the situation in order to generate understanding on the part of the conflict parties for the other side and, at best, to be able to have a mitigating effect on the situation. Finally, knowledge and methods are imparted that enable the actors to recognize, classify and de-escalate emerging conflicts at an early stage in the future. In addition, public relations work will be carried out to raise awareness of the issue of sustainable forest conversion in the context of climate change among target groups.
Research and project partners
- pro re – Partizipation und Mediation
- Forstliches Forschungs- und Kompetenzzentrum (FFK Gotha)
- Ahnen&Enkel – Agentur für Kommunikation
- Dr. Engelbert Schramm
Funding
The project “Conflicts over the forest of the future – analysis and cooperative processing of forest-related negotiation processes in the context of climate change” is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture (BMEL) within the framework of the funding programme “Renewable Resources”.
Duration
Contact persons
Project team
Project Links
Related projects
- AJAP II – Environmentally friendly and sustainable control of the Asian bush mosquito
- Approaches to long-term effective power saving advice
- Accompanying Research for the Transdisciplinary Discourse in the Kopernikus Project ENavi
- Biodiversity and Climate: Socio-ecological Biodiversity Research
- BioKompass – Communication and participation for the societal transformation towards bioeconomy
- BIOZ – Environmentally friendly control of West Nile virus transmitting mosquitoes
- CapTain Rain – Capture and retain heavy rainfalls in Jordan
- Germany under Climate Change
- DINA – Diversity of Insects in Nature protected Areas
- ecobiente - Designing Sustainable Goods more Succesfully
- EiMap – Communication strategy promoting energy-efficient refurbishment during the home purchasing process
- EKLIPSE – Knowledge and Learning Mechanism on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
- Electromobility for the Darmstadt-Rhine-Main-Neckar Region
- ENABLElocal – Enabling use of biodiversity monitoring data in local conservation management
- ENGAGE – Commitment to sustainable public welfare
- EUPOPP - Political Strategies and Tools to Promote Sustainable Consumption
- GeisTreich – Geisenheim Transfer Program for Biodiverse and Multifunctional Viticulture
- Gender Impact Assessment in Radiation Protection and Environment
- Expert report on the carbon balance of forests
- gwTriade – Integrative monitoring of groundwater quality
- Homes-uP – Single Family Homes under Pressure?
- IMAGINE – Integrated Management of Green Infrastructure
- IndUK – Individual environmental action and climate protection
- JET-SET - Emissions Trading as Social-Ecological Transformation Process
- Climate CO2NTEST – Acceptance and impact of the competition in the Hanover region
- KlimaAlltag – low carbon lifestyles in the zero emissions city
- KomKlAn – Status and Progress of Municipal Climate Adaptation in Germany
- Kommunikationskampagnen für nachhaltigen Konsum und gesellschaftliche Teilhabe
- LivingSpaces – Instruments for a needs-orientated usage of the housing stock in municipalities
- LIMO – Land Use and Integrated Modelling
- LogMob – Impact assessment of an integrated logistics and mobility concept for the German Protestant Church Congress
- MediPlanB – Effects of indigenous medicinal plants on health and biodiversity
- MORE STEP – Mobility at Risk: Sustaining the Mongolian Steppe Ecosystem (Phase I)
- MORE STEP – Mobility at Risk: Sustaining the Mongolian Steppe Ecosystem (Phase II)
- MORE STEP – Mobility at risk: Sustaining the Mongolian Steppe Ecosystem
- Sustainability Audit
- NaHa – Sustainable Practices in the Workplace and in Everyday Life
- NamTip: Desertification in drylands – a Namibian tipping point (pre-phase)
- NamTip: Understanding and Managing Desertification Tipping Points – A Namibian Perspective
- netWORKS 3 – Sustainable concepts for the municipal water sector
- NiddaMan – Sustainable Water Resources Management in the Nidda Catchment Area
- NormA – Normative Conflicts in the Field of Biodiversity
- OPTIMASS – Sustainable Management of Savanna Ecosystems
- ORYCS – Wildlife-based management strategies in Namibia
- PlaNE – Planetary Health and Sustainable Nutrition
- PowerFlex – integrating the heating and cooling sector into the electricity market model PowerFlex
- RARE - Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe
- regulate – Sustainable Groundwater Management in Europe
- RobustNature – Robustness of Nature-Society Systems in the Anthropocene
- SASSCAL – Research Infrastructure in Africa
- SASSCAL – Water-related vulnerabilities and risk in Southern Africa
- SLInBio – Urban lifestyles and the valorization of biodiversity: dragonflies, grasshoppers, bumblebees and Co
- SoCoDES – Social-ecological dynamics of ecosystem services
- SoCuLa – Socio-cultural Drivers of Biodiversity Change in Germany
- Social aspects of environmental policy
- SuPraStadt – Quality of life, participation and resource conservation through social diffusion of sufficiency practices in urban neighbourhoods
- SuPraStadt II – Quality of life, participation and resource conservation through social diffusion of sufficiency practices in urban neighbourhoods
- Synergies between environmental and social policy
- Transdisciplinarity in biodiversity research
- Transdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research
- transform-R – Shaping the energy and mobility transition as a socio-ecological transformation in the Frankfurt/Rhine-Main region
- TRI-HP – Trigeneration systems based on multiple renewable sources
- Environmental awareness in Germany 2020
- Perception and Acceptance of the Ecolabel “Blue Angel”
- Weschnitz Dialog: Communication and participation in the management of restoration measures along the river Weschnitz
- Scientific coordination of the funding initiative „An environmentally and socially compatible transformation of the German energy system”
- Knowledge transfer of the results of basic scientific research
- WissTransKlima – Knowledge transfer for better climate adaptation in municipalities
- Vision for Biodiversity